You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!
Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.
Do not worry we don't spam!
Post by : Meena Ariff
U.S. President Donald Trump has once again drawn global attention by linking his interest in taking control of Greenland to his failure to win the Nobel Peace Prize. His remarks have caused concern across Europe and raised fears that tensions could grow into another trade dispute between the United States and European countries.
Trump said he no longer thinks “purely of peace,” suggesting his outlook on world affairs has changed. He repeated his belief that his diplomatic efforts deserved greater international recognition and said missing out on the Nobel Peace Prize affected how he now views global politics.
When asked whether he would use military force to seize Greenland, Trump refused to give a clear answer. He did not confirm that force would be used, but he also did not rule it out. This unclear response has worried many leaders and analysts, who see it as a serious statement involving a peaceful territory.
Greenland is a semi-autonomous region under Denmark, but it holds growing strategic importance. Its location in the Arctic and its natural resources have made it a key area of interest for global powers, especially as climate change opens new shipping routes and access to minerals.
Trump also repeated his warning that European nations could face new tariffs if trade talks fail. These comments have revived memories of earlier trade tensions between the United States and Europe, which had caused economic uncertainty on both sides. European officials fear that renewed tariffs could hurt businesses, jobs, and long-standing alliances.
Denmark and other European leaders have strongly rejected any idea that Greenland could be taken over. Danish officials have stated clearly that Greenland is not for sale and that its future must be decided by the people who live there, not by outside pressure.
Trump’s reference to the Nobel Peace Prize stood out during the remarks. Critics say it shows personal frustration influencing major foreign policy positions, while supporters argue he is simply being open about how recognition and power shape international relations.
Experts warn that such statements could damage trust between allies and increase global uncertainty. Threats of tariffs could slow trade, while talk of force could raise serious diplomatic and legal issues.
Although no formal action has been taken, Trump’s comments have placed Greenland back at the center of international debate. World leaders and markets are now watching closely to see whether these remarks lead to real policy decisions or remain political statements.
G7, IEA Urge Coordinated Oil Reserve Release as Prices Surge
G7 finance chiefs and IEA urge coordinated release of emergency oil reserves as Middle East tensions
U.S. and China Disagree on Fentanyl, Trade at UN Meeting
At a UN drug forum in Vienna, the U.S. blames China for weak fentanyl controls; China denies claims
Netflix K-Drama ‘Still Shining’ Stars Park Jin-young
The new Netflix series follows two students whose summer friendship slowly turns into love as they n
Australia Grants Asylum to 5 Iranian Footballers
Players labelled “traitors” in Iran after refusing to sing the national anthem during the Women’s As
Disney Cancels Live-Action Robin Hood Film Project
Director Carlos López Estrada says planned remake of 1973 animated classic will no longer move forwa
Malaysia PM Anwar Says IS-Linked Extremism Under Control
Prime Minister urges vigilance after police detect radicalisation among several Malaysian youths