You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!
Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.
Do not worry we don't spam!
Post by : Shakul
A group of women in Japan have launched a landmark legal challenge against one of the country’s most restrictive reproductive health laws, arguing that it violates women’s rights to bodily autonomy.
The lawsuit, filed at the Tokyo District Court, involves five plaintiffs including Kazane Kajiya, who argue that Japan’s decades-old “maternity protection” law unfairly limits access to sterilisation.
Under the current law, women seeking sterilisation must meet strict conditions. They must already have multiple children and face health risks from pregnancy. Even in such cases, the law requires consent from their spouse before the procedure can be performed.
Critics say the rule effectively prevents healthy, childless women from choosing sterilisation as a form of contraception. Kajiya, who never wanted children, travelled to the United States at the age of 27 to undergo the procedure, where doctors removed her fallopian tubes through a minimally invasive operation.
Supporters of the lawsuit argue that the restrictions reflect outdated attitudes toward women’s roles in society. They say the policy originates from wartime population policies that viewed women primarily as mothers responsible for increasing the national birth rate.
Japan is currently facing one of the world’s fastest-aging populations and declining birth rates, prompting ongoing debates about family policy and reproductive rights.
According to global health research, more than 70 countries allow voluntary sterilisation as a recognised method of contraception. However, Japan remains among a small group of nations where access to the procedure is highly restricted.
Campaigners also point out that while men technically need spousal consent for vasectomy under the same law, enforcement is often less strict, and clinics openly advertise the procedure.
The plaintiffs argue that the law treats women as “potential mothers” rather than independent individuals capable of making decisions about their own bodies. They hope the court will recognise reproductive freedom as a constitutional right.
A verdict in the case is expected soon and could significantly influence the future of reproductive rights debates in Japan.
Taeyang Returns With First Solo Album in Years
BigBang star Taeyang celebrates 20 years in K-pop with ‘Quintessence,’ a deeply personal album relea
Taiwan Welcomes Possible Trump Call
Taiwan says a possible phone call between Donald Trump and President Lai Ching-te would strengthen t
Marco Rubio Praises Beauty Of Taj Mahal
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the Taj Mahal a “true treasure of the world” during his vis
Tripura Boy Held In Minor Girl Case
Class 9 student detained in Tripura after alleged assault on six-year-old neighbour in Khowai distri
7-Eleven Pioneer Toshifumi Suzuki Dies at 93
Toshifumi Suzuki, the visionary behind Japan’s convenience store revolution and founder of Seven-Ele
China Revises Shanxi Mine Death Toll
China lowers the death toll in the Shanxi coal mine explosion to 82 as rescue teams continue operati