Post by : Saif Rahman

In a bold shift, President Donald Trump has unveiled a comprehensive plan aimed at slashing U.S. fuel economy standards, directly countering a central initiative of former President Joe Biden's climate agenda. The strategy is intended to facilitate the sale of gasoline vehicles as attention globally turns toward cleaner technologies.

During a press conference in Washington, Trump championed the initiative, claiming that “people want gasoline cars.” He maintained that this approach would enhance affordability and consumer choices as the automotive landscape rapidly evolves.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) detailed the proposed modifications, which seek to lower Biden's mandates of achieving an average of 50.4 miles per gallon by 2031 down to 34.5 miles per gallon. This drastic cut poses a setback for the drive towards more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Furthermore, the agency plans to ease fuel economy regulations for older model years, with only minor annual increases projected—between 0.25% and 0.5% yearly—until 2031. This is a stark contrast to Biden's targets that required annual rises of 8% and 10% from 2024 through 2026.

While NHTSA suggests that consumers could save around $930 on the initial price of vehicles under Trump’s plan, they also caution that this could lead to approximately 100 billion additional gallons of gasoline usage through 2050. Such a surge might result in drivers facing up to $185 billion in extra fuel costs and roughly a 5% hike in carbon emissions.

On the flip side, automakers stand to benefit from decreased regulatory burdens, with NHTSA forecasts showing an industry savings of $35 billion by 2031, equating to nearly $9 billion for GM and over $5 billion each for Ford and Stellantis. This financial relief is why executives from major automakers have rallied behind the changes.

Ford's CEO Jim Farley voiced his support at the White House, terming the initiative a “victory for common sense and affordability.” He assured that Ford would increase investments in affordable vehicles, affirming that consumers should have the liberty of choice. GM CEO Mary Barra highlighted the pressures many auto manufacturers face from stringent state regulations, particularly in California.

Conversely, opposition looms from environmental organizations, state officials, and advocates for clean energy, who have sharply condemned the rollback. California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized Trump for purportedly “gutting fuel economy standards,” raising alarms that consumers will incur higher gasoline expenses and suffer from worsening air quality.

Additionally, the Natural Resources Defense Council cautioned that the rollback will escalate pollution levels and amplify long-term expenses for consumers, framing the initiative as favorable to the oil sector at families' expense.

Another pivotal aspect of this proposal involves the intended termination of credit trading among automakers by 2028. Under Biden's administration, electric vehicle manufacturers like Tesla and Rivian could sell unused credits to those reliant on gasoline cars. NHTSA now views this practice as a “windfall” for EV-centric firms and aims to dismantle the trading system, potentially harming Tesla and other electric brands that count on this financial influx.

Earlier this year, Trump also enacted legislation to eliminate penalties imposed on fuel economy standards dating back to 2022, further alleviating costs for car manufacturers.

These actions align with Trump's overarching objective to bolster gasoline-powered vehicles while decelerating the shift towards electric cars. His administration has dismantled EV tax incentives and obstructed California's long-term proposition to ban new gas car sales after 2035.

Proponents of Trump's policies argue that the automotive market should mature without harsh governmental constraints, while critics assert the necessity of preparing for a sustainable future to shield consumers from soaring fuel prices.

Transportation is recognized as the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions within the United States. The preservation of Biden's regulations was anticipated to save around 64 billion gallons of gasoline and diminish emissions by over 650 million metric tons. NHTSA now warns that Trump’s initiative could escalate emissions, matching levels akin to adding nearly 8 million additional vehicles by 2035.

The ongoing debate surrounding these fuel regulations exemplifies the stark division between two competing visions for America's automotive future: one that champions traditional cars and prioritizes lower initial costs, and another that underscores environmental accountability, long-term savings, and advancement in clean technology.

As this proposal undergoes evaluation, stakeholders—ranging from auto manufacturers to environmental groups and countless drivers—will be observing with keen interest. The final determination may significantly influence the trajectory of the U.S. automotive sector in the years to come.

#Global News #World #Global Updates #World News #Global Global News world news