Post by : Meena Ariff

With the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) under mandatory review, prominent U.S. industries are fervently urging the administration to retain this vital trade agreement and eliminate tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico. Public hearings scheduled in Washington this week will delve into the agreement's impact on North American trade.

Industry input highlights the extensive advantages that CUSMA brings to U.S. manufacturing, construction, automotive, and consumer goods industries. The National Association of Manufacturers refers to the deal as "the most pro-U.S. manufacturing trade agreement in history," underscoring its significance in boosting domestic production and enhancing global competitiveness.

International trade expert Julian Karaguesian reviewed several submissions, which exhibited strong backing for the agreement, with many proponents calling for tariff removal and sustained trilateral trade collaboration.

Construction associations, including the National Association of Home Builders, underline the critical role of Canadian softwood lumber in affordable housing projects. Leading car manufacturers like GM and Ford assert that CUSMA has spurred over $60 billion in investments across North America, thereby increasing their competitiveness against global players.

Retail and consumer goods representatives echoed these sentiments, citing benefits that the agreement provides to American consumers and supply chains. They warn that complete renegotiation could ignite trade disputes and create market upheaval.

While support for CUSMA is widespread, certain sectors, particularly steel and dairy, have raised concerns regarding specific clauses. Uncertainty looms over the agreement's future as President Trump, who was at the forefront of negotiating CUSMA in his first term, has expressed skepticism during his second term.

The upcoming tri-nation review, commencing July 1, may result in a possible extension of up to 16 years, renegotiation of essential aspects, or, if consensus isn't reached, a withdrawal. Analysts caution that frequent annual reviews risk denting investor confidence and destabilizing long-term economic planning within the region.

#Business News #Canada News #Trade