You have not yet added any article to your bookmarks!
Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.
Do not worry we don't spam!
Post by : Meena Ariff
A South Korean court on Friday sentenced former president Yoon Suk Yeol to five years in prison for crimes linked to his failed attempt to impose martial law in December 2024, marking a dramatic fall for a leader once at the center of the country’s political power.
The Seoul Central District Court found Yoon guilty of abusing his authority and obstructing justice by mobilising the presidential security service to block investigators who were attempting to arrest him. The court ruled that his actions directly interfered with the lawful execution of an arrest warrant and violated the constitutional order.
Judges said that after declaring martial law, Yoon ordered members of the presidential security detail to physically prevent law enforcement officers from entering certain locations connected to him. This deliberate use of state security forces to shield himself from investigation was described by the court as a serious crime that undermined the rule of law and democratic principles.
The court also determined that Yoon failed to follow legally required procedures when he attempted to impose martial law. He did not properly consult the Cabinet, did not meet constitutional conditions for such an extraordinary measure, and was found to have approved or relied on inaccurate official documents to justify the declaration. These actions, the judges said, showed a clear misuse of presidential powers.
Yoon’s attempt to impose martial law on December 3, 2024, triggered a major national crisis. The sudden announcement led to widespread public protests and immediate political backlash. Lawmakers quickly moved to overturn the order, and the National Assembly later impeached him. In April 2025, he was formally removed from office following a constitutional review.
Friday’s sentencing is the first court ruling in a series of criminal cases linked to the martial law episode. Yoon is still facing additional trials, including more serious charges related to rebellion and threats to constitutional governance. Prosecutors have indicated they will continue pursuing the remaining cases, which could carry heavier penalties if convictions are secured.
During the sentencing, Yoon remained largely expressionless as the verdict was read out. His legal team stated that they plan to appeal the ruling, arguing that his actions were taken during an exceptional political crisis and that the judgment does not fully reflect the context of the situation.
The case has deeply shaken South Korea’s political system and sparked renewed debate over the limits of presidential power. Legal experts say the verdict sends a strong signal that no individual, including a former head of state, is above the law.
Yoon’s conviction and prison sentence mark one of the most significant political downfalls in South Korea’s modern history, underscoring the country’s strict constitutional safeguards and its commitment to democratic accountability.
Pakistan Expands Arms Influence, Eyes Islamic NATO in Arab World
Pakistan strengthens military ties in the Arab world, negotiating arms deals and a trilateral Islami
Harvard Drops to Third in Global Science Ranking, China Leads Again
Harvard University falls to third in the CWTS Leiden 2025 Science ranking, while Chinese universitie
Canada, China Open New Chapter With Strategic Partnership Talks
Canada and China begin rebuilding relations as Prime Minister Mark Carney meets President Xi Jinping
Batangas Court Orders Arrest of Atong Ang in Missing Sabungeros Case
A Batangas court has ordered the arrest of tycoon Atong Ang and others over the disappearance of sab
China Gives $2.8M Aid to Thailand After Fatal High-Speed Rail Accident
China provides 20 million yuan in cash and relief supplies to Thailand after the deadly crane collap
BPL 2026 in Turmoil as Player Boycott Sparks Board Resignation
Bangladesh Premier League hits turbulence after top players boycott over official's controversial re