Post by : Shweta

An internal report has emerged, shedding light on the Canadian Armed Forces’ breach of intelligence-gathering protocols during their COVID-19 operations. This situation raises critical questions about oversight and public data protection.

CBC News obtained the report, detailing how various military units collected information on Canadians without the necessary authorization or training. These actions were part of Operation Laser, initiated in 2020 to assist with Canada’s pandemic response.

The findings reveal that some personnel monitored public sentiment using personal devices, unregulated internet connections, and their private social media accounts, often exceeding the mission's required scope. Platforms utilized included Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and Instagram, tracking discussions linked to COVID-19 and the military's participation.

Experts criticized the operation for its lack of structure and proper oversight. Wesley Wark remarked that the endeavor was poorly conceived and should have never proceeded in its initial format, as untrained individuals handled intelligence tasks without understanding the operational and legal limits.

One major concern raised was the disregard for basic intelligence protocols; for instance, some units failed to delete necessary data about Canadians or to use secure methods for monitoring. In some instances, the scope of monitoring even extended beyond pandemic issues, including movements such as Black Lives Matter, which strayed from mission directives.

Moreover, certain units bypassed directives to use official systems, opting instead for personal accounts, which heightened the risk of sensitive operational exposure. The absence of mandatory risk assessments further compromised the mission's integrity.

This controversy traces back to 2020 when allegations emerged regarding the military's exploration of influence tactics to manipulate public opinion during the pandemic. Despite then Chief of Defence Staff Jonathan Vance’s orders to cease specific activities, many reportedly persisted for months.

Analysts believe this situation has eroded public confidence and highlighted vulnerabilities within the legal framework governing military intelligence in Canada. Concerns linger about potential repeat incidents, as recommendations for more defined laws and guidelines remain inadequately implemented.

The Department of National Defence has yet to issue a public response regarding this report. Experts continue advocating for enhanced accountability, clearer regulations, and improved oversight to ensure intelligence practices respect privacy rights and legal limitations.

#Global News #Canada News #CNI News